Real estate

An Assessment of Pakistan’s Early Urban Planning Policies (1947 – 1997)

By 11/12/2020 May 28th, 2022 1 Comments

Preamble

Pakistan faced a myriad of challenges in the early phase of the country’s formation. Despite an influx of refugees, weak government institutions, and many urban challenges, Pakistan managed to steer itself out of the crisis. The article presents the public policies and programs adopted in dealing with the urban situation in Pakistan during the first fifty years (1947-1997). The policies fall into three distinct phases of the evolving political and economic regimes. An analysis of how successful these policies and programs have been in managing the urban crisis of Pakistan during the period is also presented. The effect of these policies on present urban planning structures and initiatives is also discussed.

Introduction

Several urban problems besiege Pakistan: a shortage of housing, an ill-managed land market, inefficient land-use systems, and huge shortfalls in water supply, sewers, drainage, waste disposal, traffic management, electricity, transport, and pollution control. These problems are widespread, but they are also increasing the social disparities between the rich and the poor on a massive scale. The whole situation is summed up in the term “urban crisis”. Pakistan remains a pioneer in formalising physical planning and housing as a development function. It has a long and distinguished record of urban planning at the national level. The policies are reflected in five-year plans and urban development budgets in the first fifty years of Pakistan’s inception. Being a low-income country with an increasing population, it is evident that urban planning in Pakistan remained restricted due to budget constraints. However, these policies did amass major achievements but were later used to enhance private interests at the cost of public welfare. Pakistan also developed sizable institutional structures in physical planning and environmental sectors. All in all, previous urban policies have achieved a lot in Pakistan. Still, lessons and insights can be taken from the shortfalls to improve future urban policies.

Urbanisation and Urban Policy in Pakistan

The concentration of people in towns and cities is called urbanisation. It results in the growth of urban areas and is closely linked to industrialisation and the sociological process of modernisation. The term is also used to represent the level of urban development relative to the overall population. The level of urbanisation increased from about 18 per cent in 1951 to 32 per cent in 1991 (Finance Division, 1994). This shows that Pakistan is rapidly urbanising and transforming the country’s social structure and settlement system. About one-third of Pakistan’s population lives in urban settlements (Qadeer, 1996). This has led to the disappearance of open countryside wilderness and the emergence of open sewers, garbage heaps, stores, homes, and factories. The problems that emerge due to urbanisation affect the people, but they also affect the environment and society at large.

Pakistan has been among the pioneers of initiating urban planning policies. Since 1950, when development planning began, “Housing and Settlements” have been a distinct planning chapter in the government’s five-year plans. Urban policies refer to governmental acts that affect the structure, administration, and quality of life in urban areas through the provision of infrastructure, land development, and regulation of civic amenities (Qadeer, 1996). Urban policies also act as a tool for guiding and framing the internal structure of human settlements. From the beginning, the basic tenets of urban planning have focused on mobilising labour, funds, and physical resources of the people who own and use common buildings. The public role is to lay an effective institutional, infrastructural, and financial framework for the private market. At the same time, the government should provide resources that individuals cannot provide.

Pakistan’s urban and housing programs fall under five key policy areas: housing and Katchi Abadi improvement, provision of community utilities, institution building, government buildings, and special projects for tribal areas. The policies aim to ensure smooth provision of water supplies, efficient sewerage systems, public transport, and overall sanitation. Institutional building is particularly important for carrying out surveys, designs, and planning for future cities alongside the formation of provincial and local planning and housing departments. The plan and programs for each of the different policy areas remained consistent and continued during the forty years of development of the sector. Although the allocation of funds varied over time, the objective of programs remained unchanged (Qadeer, 1996).

Phase One of Urban Policies 1947 – 1970 

Since independence (1947), Pakistan’s urban problems have multiplied manifolds and evolved in scope and complexity. Examining the impact of Pakistan’s urban policies can be divided into three phases. The first phase saw the resettlement of refugees in the aftermath of Muslims migrating from India. According to Waterston (1963), eighty-seven per cent of the population lived in rural areas at independence. The key element of urban housing schemes remained core housing schemes (one to two-room quarters) to fulfil the needs of migrants urgently. Rehabilitation of refugees was also a major reason for the suburban expansion of cities in the form of satellite towns.

The pre-independence tradition of plot development and housing schemes continued as a policy instrument with public-funded development projects, housing colonies, and land service schemes. During this phase, an emphasis was also laid on developing government buildings and houses for public servants. The first three five-year plans focused more on developing property and master plans and schemes for major cities. Planning regulation, urban administration, and traffic management were largely ignored during this phase.

The evaluation of the third five-year plan concluded that these plans could not keep up with the housing needs; the housing shortage increased from 0.6 million units in 1960 to 1.5 million dwellings, and only 10 per cent of the population had safe piped water supply by 1970 (Government of Pakistan, 1964). The disparity between the middle and upper classes increased, and the working class and the poor divide also widened. The Planning Commission concluded in the third five-year plan that the policies pursued so far need a thorough re-examination and reorientation” (Government of Pakistan, 1964).

Phase Two of Urban Policies 1971 – 1978 

The separation of East Pakistan in 1971 brought down the second Martial Law government and brought in six years of populist rule. The new government tilted towards public initiatives for socio-economic development, mainly by providing mass housing for the working and lower classes. A new swarm of squatter settlements had emerged in major cities, and it became the prime concern to deliver urban services for them. These programs were accompanied by a site and service up-gradation policy for low-income households. The World Bank started lending to Pakistan for urban projects, and such programs were a high priority. Thousands of core houses were built for the poor and low-income groups, but the programs were not evaluated, and no reliable statistics to gauge their performance exist.  The significant fact from a policy perspective is that the public sector took on the responsibility of housing for the poor, and subsequent regimes continued adopting them. Another step was that autonomous development authorities were established for cities to undertake public works, water sewerage, and transport.

During the era of military rule under Zia, housing and commercial plots were given at subsidised rates to politicians and public officeholders. These plots were a means of acquiring assets whose actual value was five to ten times the official price. This became a currency for corruption, and the policy is now entrenched in Pakistan’s political and administrative system. Urban development in this period also saw the introduction of international bodies’ influence on Pakistan’s policies. Thus, began an era of international agencies making policies as solutions to the urban problems of Pakistan. Large scale migration of Pakistani workers to the Middle East and Britain transformed the urban landscape. The remittances triggered home building activities, and a boost in the consumer industry was seen. Private housing buildings, both in cities and villages, saw a massive improvement and fuelled the speculative rise of the land market, leading to the development of an informal land market.
The second phase continued the policies of the first phase, along with acknowledging the needs of poor and low-income social classes. The ground was laid for international agencies to determine the urban policies of Pakistan. About 1.43 million units, 40.4 per cent of the housing stock in 1980, were built in the previous ten years, compared to 1.4 million or 39.6 per cent made in the preceding 23 years since the birth of Pakistan (Qadeer, 1996).

Phase Three of Urban Policies 1980 – 1995 

After ousting of Bhutto in 1977 by General Zia, it took about three years to affect policies, but urban policies remained unaltered. The fifth five-year plan remained focused on mobilising the private sector, slum improvements, site development, and expansion of safe water supplies (Government of Pakistan, 1978). A shift to greater reliance on the private sector for managing urban facilities occurred during the 1980s and 1990s. The previous development plans continued, but the difference lay in the scale and focus. The seventh plan (1988 – 1993) allocated Rs 20 billion for physical planning and housing. It aimed at fulfilling the incremental demand for affordable housing for the poor and low-income households but now on a self-finance basis (Government of Pakistan, 1988). This introduced a cost recovery policy, smaller subsidies, and local responsibility as highlighting factors in the 1990s. The Orangi Pilot Project (OPP), started in a slum in Karachi (1980), is the most famous and successful of local self-help efforts.

Community-based organisations were topped by international NGOs, many of which emerged with foreign grants and international funding. This contributed to the paving of streets, water supply schemes, and schools in cities and villages. The sixth five-year plan began with a cumulative shortage of 1.4 million housing units in 1983. By 1995, the housing deficit had combined to reach 6.25 million, and additional 150,000 units per year were required to meet the new demands (Government of Pakistan, 1996). Another significant development seen was the introduction of universities, the Army, the Railways, the Water and Power Authority, and other public corporations in land development, forming societies and foundations. The urban land market became highly speculative in the 1990s, and house prices remained unaffordable for the professional class.

The land market remained highly fragmented, speculative, and embedded in the network of privilege, connections and mobilisation. Dowall (1991) and Nientied (1987) have documented these features of the residential land market in Karachi for both upper- and lower-income areas. The enormous unmet demand for housing co-existed with many hundred thousand residential plots lying vacant. Both factors point to poor public management of the land development process.

Conclusion

Urban policies have led to notable achievements and, at the same time, extensive failures. Over the years, cities have grown into metropolises, and towns have transformed into cities. As Pakistan remains one of the pioneering countries that instituted urban policies, it started from scratch by developing sizable institutional structures in public and private spheres. Ministries, divisions, public corporations, planning commissions, research institutes, laboratories, consultants, NGOs, land developers, home builders, and almost all public and private elements of an urban development system have been developed. But urban development requires a variety of collective goods for the welfare of citizens and not only plot and work development. The knowledge base of urban policies has largely remained fixed in the wake of the internationalisation of urban policies, and the absence of accountability measures in the policy-making processes has eroded the capacity to develop a knowledge base. Overall, the approaches yielded favourable outcomes for Pakistan and reforms, and future planning can enhance the success of such policies in achieving their targets.

Bibliography

Finance Division, Government of Pakistan. (1994). Economic Survey of Pakistan 1993-1994. Islamabad.

Government of Pakistan. (1964). Outline of the Third Five Year Plan. Karachi: The Manager of Publications, Karachi.

Government of Pakistan, (1978). The Fifth Five-Year Plan, 1978–1983. Islamabad: Planning Commission.

Government of Pakistan, (1988). Seventh Five-Year Plan, 1988–93 and Perspective Plan 1988–2003. Islamabad: Planning Commission

Pakistan, Government, (1996). Pakistan National Report HABITAT II. Islamabad: Ministry of Environment Urban Affairs, Forestry and Wildlife.

Dowall, D. E. (1991). A Tale of Two Cities: A Comparison of Karachi’s Informal and Formal Housing Delivery Systems. Berkeley: University of California. (Working Paper 530)

Nientied, P. (1987) Practice and Theory of Urban Policy in the Third World, Low Income Housing in Karachi. Amsterdam: CHD.

Qadeer, M. A. (1996). An Assessment of Pakistan’s Urban Policies, 1947 – 1997. The Pakistan Development Review, 4, 443-465. Retrieved November 19, 2020, from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjn-bawpY7tAhWQXsAKHci4CwkQFjABegQIAxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pide.org.pk%2Fpdf%2FPDR%2F1996%2FVolume4%2F443-465.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0tVjvYAXqCnyXglUcSCjsq

Waterston, A. (1963). Planning in Pakistan. In A. Waterston, Planning in Pakistan (p. 6). Maryland, Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press.

1 Comments

  • Aw, this was an exceptionally good post. Taking a few minutes and actual effort to generate a really good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate a whole lot and don’t seem to get nearly anything done.

Leave a Reply